advantages and disadvantages of committees for administration and management


  • Presently a-days councils are generally utilized as a part of all ranges of organization and administration because of the accompanying reasons: 

  • Focal points 

  • 1. Pooling of learning and experience: 

  • The individual abilities and Consequently of a few people are pooled together. Assemble considerations and joined judgment of the considerable number of individuals can be applied as a powerful influence for imperative issues. There can be a more practical and target examination of the issue from all edges. This enhances the nature of choices. Business issues are multifaceted and require broadness of choice. Subjective and uneven choices can be minimized. "At the point when a few people think about and ponder on each basic issue, there is more affirmation that each aspect will be altogether investigated and said something terms of the premiums of the organization as a whole."1 A gathering of individuals can convey to manage a more extensive scope of experience and a more careful prob­ing of truths than a solitary individual. 

  • 2. Enhanced correspondence: 

  • Advisory groups serve as essential method for correspondence between the individuals from an association. Informa­tion and thoughts can be effectively transmitted both upward and descending. Unwritten arrangements and destinations can be clarified successfully through considerations of an advisory group. Inventive thoughts rise up out of cooperations among the individuals. Questions and equivocalness can be expelled on the spot. 

  • 3. Office of coordination: 

  • Support in panel gatherings pro­motes shared comprehension, collaboration and participation among workers. Boards of trustees serve as a critical strategy of coordination by uniting directors from various offices. Individuals from an advisory group come to welcome each other's perspective and they can seek after a typical strategy. A board is a valuable method for incorporating and binding together different perspectives. 

  • 4. Better inspiration: 

  • Boards enhance the inspiration and spirit of representatives by giving them a chance to express them­ selves. Interest in the basic leadership handle not just enhances nature of choices, it makes a feeling of having a place. Workers are enthused about the execution of choices really taking shape of which they have taken a dynamic part. 

  • 5. Official advancement: 

  • A board of trustees is a helpful gadget for educat­ing and preparing subordinate directors. Support in advisory group gatherings gives chance to learning through understanding. A chief figures out how to take an integrative perspective of hierarchical issues by serving on different councils. Official advancement guarantees con­tinuity of administration in the association. 

  • 6. Majority rule administration: 

  • As a plural official, a board keeps away from the danger of centralization of a lot of power in the individual and the risk of mishandle of force. There is no dread of appointing an excess of power to one person. The oppression of a capable head can be lessened. Assemble power makes for dissemination of force and demo­cratic authority. 

  • 7. Representation of interests: 

  • Different intrigue gatherings can be given representation on a board. Such representation might be important to secure the dedication and collaboration of individuals. Individuals can be illuminated on arrangement matters and thoughts past the limit of one individual can be produced. 

  • 8. Union of power: 

  • The chief of each division or segment may have a segment of the aggregate power required to take a deci­sion. Such power is known as fragmented power. In such a case, a panel of various directors might be constituted to unite the power. Along these lines the choice can be taken without reference to the more elevated amount. Be that as it may, visit requirement for union of chipped power is the indication of a poor association structure. 

  • 9. Shirking of activity: 

  • Now and then, boards of trustees are constituted to put off or maintain a strategic distance from activity. So as to chill fomentation and temper with respect to workers, the matter might be alluded to a board of trustees. Deferring of activity through an advisory group is a technique for conquering resistance, weight or restriction from influenced individuals. 

  • Impediments: 

  • The advisory group type of association experiences the accompanying shortcomings: 

  • 1. Uncertainty: 

  • By and large, it takes more time to get choice or activity from an advisory group than from a person. Individuals from a board of trustees have a tendency to enjoy long, examinations. Each part has the privilege to talk and be listened. Matters are superfluously dragged. Feeling is separated and choices get deferred. Cooperative choice procedures are not proper where incite activity is required. Because of clashing view­points, an advisory group neglects to achieve a choice in time. 

  • 2. High expenses: 

  • A ton of use and time is brought about in gathering gatherings and giving setting out or other stipend to individuals. There­fore, boards of trustees are a costly type of organization. All things considered a board ought to be designated just when the additions of advisory group work legitimize the s costs. Panel work is extremely tedious. 

  • 3. Traded off choices: 

  • Board of trustees choices are regularly average bargains between clashing perspectives. A definitive choices may mirror the supposition of none so that there is little energy for them. Singular speculation is relied upon to comply with the normal or gathering considering. Such leveling impact or log-moving diminishes the nature of deci­sion. The trade off is regularly touched base in any event shared factor. In this way, board of trustees choices are not really the best choices but rather just satisfactory ones. 

  • 4. Diffused duty: 

  • No part can be exclusively considered in charge of a wrong choice taken by a council. As nobody feels responsible for results, individuals avoid their duties. The advisory group turns into a sorted out method for passing the buck. As per boards of trustees don't really expand the vote based process organization. 

  • 5. Control by few: 

  • A couple of forceful or vocal individuals regularly command advisory group's thoughts. A minority assemble practices a ridiculous oppression disregarding the enthusiasm of different individuals. Individuals as often as possible look to secure their limited sectional interests. There is an inclination to cloud the main problems and acquire incidental matters for discus­sion frequently an advisory group turns into a fight ground for warring camps to settle individual scores. 

  • 6 Propagation: 

  • Panels tend to sustain them­ selves even after the reason for existing is served. There exist excessively numerous councils notwithstanding for routine issues. Some of the time boards are delegated to simply maintain a strategic distance from activities. Such boards of trustees fill no helpful need and the aggrie­ved individuals remain oppressed. It is frequently hard to break up an advisory group notwithstanding when it has outlasted its utility. 

  • 7. Absence of mystery: 

  • It is hard to keep up mystery with respect to the choices and moves made by an advisory group. A substantial number of people partake in advisory group gatherings. 

  • Because of its shortcomings and abuse, a board of trustees has been depicted as "a gathering of unfits connected with by the unwilling to do the pointless." A few people comment that a council is a gathering of individuals who indi­vidually can do only who can get together and choose that noth­ing should be possible. Such comment reflects broad dissatisfaction and dis­illusionment with boards of trustees.

Comments